| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
- Handle InterruptedExceptions as discussed in
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3976344/handling-interruptedexception-in-java
- Remove unused imports.
|
|
- Before: Upon receipt of a message via the msg/ endpoint, MOA ZS
would immediately acknowledge the receipt without verifying that the
message was successfully processed by the backend.
- Now: MOA ZS receives a message via the msg/ endpoint, forwards it to
the sinks, and acknowledges the receipt if and only if the
processing succeeded.
|
|
- Problem: I fixed CompletableFuture.*async within the DeliveryRequest
flow, but forgot to do the same for the DeliveryRequestStatus /
DeliveryNotification flow.
- Solution: Ensure that all CompletableFuture.*async() invocations
have Spring's task executor attached.
|
|
- Former: Fail with Exception.
- Now: Issue a warning and fall back to default configuration profile
after verifying that sinks in default configuration profile are
correctly configured.
- Refactor: Make DEFAULT_CONFIG_KEY static.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Service Timeout : Add service timeout to mzs schema (DeliveryRequest
/ Config), application.yaml, convert service timeout from spring
environment to Config, and merge service timeouts in Configs.
- Handling of Asynchronous DeliveryRequestStatus: Move "Applying
Response Sinks" from backend into dedicated component
"MsgResponseSinkHub" and integrate SinkHub into MzsService (apply
sinks to asynchronous responses).
- Remove line breaks in SignatureVerifier's log statements.
- Revise documentation of parameters in application.yaml.
|
|
Reason: MoaZSException (and: its builder) were used to collect
intermediary results while stepping through the delivery request
backend. These results were needed to generate meaningful responses
towards the sender application in case of error. However, the builder
sprawled over too many interfaces (e.g. DeliveryRequestBackend and
TNVZHelper) and it became difficult to understand from where
intermediary results originated.
Solution: Put MoaZSException on diet:
- Remove all DeliveryAnswer fields from MoaZSException and refactor
code base to ensure that the removed fields get sourced by other
means.
- Remove Builder since amount of parameters is manageable.
Refactor DeliveryRequestBackend:
- Instead of passing down the builder and using MoaZSException as the
only source for intermediary results, we collect available results
at the outermost stack frame (DeliveryRequestBackend.accept) and
only retrieve results via exception if those results appear
somewhere down the stack frame (E.g. PredviceNoteSent). We collect
available results with the "fallbackAnswerBuilder" and switch to the
msg client response, once received.
Refactor MsgResponseBackend:
- Handle cases (response missing, binary response missing) properly.
- Integrate changes from MsgResponse.generateError()
Refactor TVNZHelper:
- Remove MoaZSExceptionBuilder from all interfaces.
Refactor MsgResponse.generateError:
- Change interface such that it's more intuitive.
- Implement NotificationResponse.generateError.
- Implement RequestStatusResponse.generateError.
Others:
- Replace all invocations against MoaZSException.Builder.
|
|
MZS Schema Change:
- Add configuration for ForwardResponseToServiceSink
(add parameters in mzs:DeliveryRequest/Config)
- Add sink configuration in application.yaml, convert from Spring
Environment to ConfigType, and merge ConfigTypes.
- Validate sink configuration completeness.
Contract added:
- Add contract mzs2app.wsdl: This contract specifies how
mzs:DeliveryRequestStatus' and mzs:DeliveryNotifications are
forwarded to the sender application.
- Implement "ForwardResponseToService" Sink.
- Add and implement MsgResponse.sendToMzsClient() : This is a somewhat
unfortunate solution because, intuitively, sending should be done by
it's caller, the "ForwardResponseToService"-sink. However, this
solution prevents differences between msg:DeliveryRequestStatus and
msg:DeliveryNotification (and code that needs to handle differences,
i.e. sending) from sprawling outside of the respective MsgResponse
derivatives. We move the entire "send" process into MsgResponse to
prevent a hard-to-maintain "if type == notification then do x else
to y" construct in ForwardResponseToServiceSink. Otherwise,
introducing the MsgResponse wrapper was pointless.
|
|
- Fix in ConfigUtil: SaveResponseToFile boolean would override
LogResponse configuration (Copy Paste Error).
|
|
- MZS Schema Change: Add "MsgResponseSinks" element to
mzs:DeliveryRequest/Config that allows sender to configure how
MsgResponses should be archived.
- ConfigUtil: Interpret MsgResponseSink parameters from Spring
Environment and merge with ConfigType.
- MsgResponseBackend: Send responses to sinks according to
MsgResponseSinks in Config
- application.yaml: Add MsgResponseSinks parameter to configuration.
- Uncouple Sink implementations from java.util.function.Function,
because the sink interfaces are going to differ and there is no need
to unite them under one interface.
- Add and test LogResponseSink, which logs responses to it's logger.
- MsgResponse: Add JAXB getter for response. Reason: Can be passed to
marshaller.
|
|
Reason:
- Interfaces with a single method can be replaced with
interfaces from java.util.function.
- Less interfaces = less code = less maintenance!
- Spring can inject beans by name so we name dependencies correctly
to prevent ambiguity.
Others:
- Rename process to backend since backend gives a better description
of its components.
|
