Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
MZS Schema Change:
- Add configuration for ForwardResponseToServiceSink
(add parameters in mzs:DeliveryRequest/Config)
- Add sink configuration in application.yaml, convert from Spring
Environment to ConfigType, and merge ConfigTypes.
- Validate sink configuration completeness.
Contract added:
- Add contract mzs2app.wsdl: This contract specifies how
mzs:DeliveryRequestStatus' and mzs:DeliveryNotifications are
forwarded to the sender application.
- Implement "ForwardResponseToService" Sink.
- Add and implement MsgResponse.sendToMzsClient() : This is a somewhat
unfortunate solution because, intuitively, sending should be done by
it's caller, the "ForwardResponseToService"-sink. However, this
solution prevents differences between msg:DeliveryRequestStatus and
msg:DeliveryNotification (and code that needs to handle differences,
i.e. sending) from sprawling outside of the respective MsgResponse
derivatives. We move the entire "send" process into MsgResponse to
prevent a hard-to-maintain "if type == notification then do x else
to y" construct in ForwardResponseToServiceSink. Otherwise,
introducing the MsgResponse wrapper was pointless.
|
|
- Fix in ConfigUtil: SaveResponseToFile boolean would override
LogResponse configuration (Copy Paste Error).
|
|
- MZS Schema Change: Add "MsgResponseSinks" element to
mzs:DeliveryRequest/Config that allows sender to configure how
MsgResponses should be archived.
- ConfigUtil: Interpret MsgResponseSink parameters from Spring
Environment and merge with ConfigType.
- MsgResponseBackend: Send responses to sinks according to
MsgResponseSinks in Config
- application.yaml: Add MsgResponseSinks parameter to configuration.
- Uncouple Sink implementations from java.util.function.Function,
because the sink interfaces are going to differ and there is no need
to unite them under one interface.
- Add and test LogResponseSink, which logs responses to it's logger.
- MsgResponse: Add JAXB getter for response. Reason: Can be passed to
marshaller.
|
|
|
|
Reason:
- Interfaces with a single method can be replaced with
interfaces from java.util.function.
- Less interfaces = less code = less maintenance!
- Spring can inject beans by name so we name dependencies correctly
to prevent ambiguity.
Others:
- Rename process to backend since backend gives a better description
of its components.
|