From 29f01a4975f637c26fbcd0b43a9c844d7d3d2e54 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Florian Reimair Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 15:57:30 +0100 Subject: fetch requested attributes from configuration --- .../id/configuration/validation/moaconfig/StorkConfigValidator.java | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'id/ConfigWebTool') diff --git a/id/ConfigWebTool/src/main/java/at/gv/egovernment/moa/id/configuration/validation/moaconfig/StorkConfigValidator.java b/id/ConfigWebTool/src/main/java/at/gv/egovernment/moa/id/configuration/validation/moaconfig/StorkConfigValidator.java index b69d37d57..b73859d81 100644 --- a/id/ConfigWebTool/src/main/java/at/gv/egovernment/moa/id/configuration/validation/moaconfig/StorkConfigValidator.java +++ b/id/ConfigWebTool/src/main/java/at/gv/egovernment/moa/id/configuration/validation/moaconfig/StorkConfigValidator.java @@ -90,12 +90,13 @@ public class StorkConfigValidator { // check attributes if (MiscUtil.isNotEmpty(form.getAttributes())) { for(StorkAttribute check : form.getAttributes()) { - if (ValidationHelper.containsPotentialCSSCharacter(check.getName(), true)) { + String tmp = check.getName().replace("eidas/attributes/", ""); // since eIDaS attributes come with a "/", we need to exclude them from validation. TODO Or should we require the admin to escape them in the UI? + if (ValidationHelper.containsPotentialCSSCharacter(tmp, true)) { log.warn("default attributes contains potentail XSS characters: " + check); errors.add(LanguageHelper.getErrorString("validation.stork.requestedattributes", new Object[] {ValidationHelper.getPotentialCSSCharacter(true)}, request )); } - if(!check.getName().toLowerCase().matches("^[a-z0-9]*$")) { + if(!tmp.toLowerCase().matches("^[A-Za-z]*$")) { log.warn("default attributes do not match the requested format : " + check); errors.add(LanguageHelper.getErrorString("validation.stork.requestedattributes", new Object[] {check}, request )); -- cgit v1.2.3